Air Mauritius vs ANA (All Nippon Airways) Business Class Comparison
| Air Mauritius | ANA (All Nippon Airways) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout | The Room Lie-flat Suite |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 20 inches | 24 inches |
| Alliance | None | Star Alliance |
| IATA | MK | NH |
| Hubs | Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International (MRU) | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) |
Air Mauritius — Pros & Cons
- + Modern A350 and A330neo fleet
- + Friendly Mauritian hospitality
- + Direct routes to island paradise destination
- − Small route network
- − Limited lounge options at outstations
- − No alliance partnership for earning miles
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Air Mauritius. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while Air Mauritius offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.