ANA (All Nippon Airways) vs Qantas Business Class Comparison
| ANA (All Nippon Airways) | Qantas | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Seat type | The Room Lie-flat Suite | Lie-flat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 24 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | Oneworld |
| IATA | NH | QF |
| Hubs | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) | Sydney (SYD), Melbourne (MEL) |
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
Qantas — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A380 upper-deck product
- + Award-winning Australian wines
- + Strong Oneworld partnership network
- − Ageing A330 cabins on some routes
- − Limited non-stop routes from Australia
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 8/10 for Qantas. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while Qantas offers Lie-flat. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.