ANA (All Nippon Airways) vs Royal Brunei Airlines Business Class Comparison
| ANA (All Nippon Airways) | Royal Brunei Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | The Room Lie-flat Suite | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on 787 |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 24 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | None |
| IATA | NH | BI |
| Hubs | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) | Bandar Seri Begawan (BWN) |
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
Royal Brunei Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Modern 787 product with spacious lie-flat seats
- + Calm and attentive service
- + Dry airline but generous soft product
- − No alcohol served (dry airline)
- − Very small route network
- − Limited lounge options at outstations
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Royal Brunei Airlines. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while Royal Brunei Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on 787. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.