ANA (All Nippon Airways) vs SAS Scandinavian Airlines Business Class Comparison
| ANA (All Nippon Airways) | SAS Scandinavian Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | The Room Lie-flat Suite | Lie-flat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 24 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | SkyTeam |
| IATA | NH | SK |
| Hubs | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) | Copenhagen (CPH), Stockholm Arlanda (ARN), Oslo Gardermoen (OSL) |
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
SAS Scandinavian Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + New A350 product
- + Strong Scandinavian network
- + SkyTeam partner benefits
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Recently switched from Star Alliance to SkyTeam
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for SAS Scandinavian Airlines. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while SAS Scandinavian Airlines offers Lie-flat. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.