Air France vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Air France | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat with French Fine Dining | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | SkyTeam | Oneworld |
| IATA | AF | MH |
| Hubs | Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport (CDG) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Air France — Pros & Cons
- + Outstanding French-inspired fine dining at altitude
- + Reverse herringbone 1-2-1 on most long-haul aircraft
- + Elegant cabin design and amenity kits
- − No enclosed suite or door on current product
- − Some older A330 routes have less competitive seats
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Air France takes the edge with a 8/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Malaysia Airlines. Air France stands out with its Lie-flat Seat with French Fine Dining, while Malaysia Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.