ANA (All Nippon Airways) vs China Airlines Business Class Comparison
| ANA (All Nippon Airways) | China Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | The Room Lie-flat Suite | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 24 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | SkyTeam |
| IATA | NH | CI |
| Hubs | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) | Taipei Taoyuan (TPE) |
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
China Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Refined Taiwanese service and cuisine
- + Good value premium fares from Asia
- − Older 777 and A330 products less competitive
- − Brand sometimes confused with mainland Chinese carriers
- − Limited long-haul network
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for China Airlines. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while China Airlines offers Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.