ANA (All Nippon Airways) vs Garuda Indonesia Business Class Comparison
| ANA (All Nippon Airways) | Garuda Indonesia | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | The Room Lie-flat Suite | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 24 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | SkyTeam |
| IATA | NH | GA |
| Hubs | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) | Jakarta Soekarno-Hatta (CGK) |
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
Garuda Indonesia — Pros & Cons
- + Award-winning cabin crew service
- + Excellent Indonesian cuisine onboard
- + Modern A330neo product
- − International network has shrunk in recent years
- − Financial difficulties have affected consistency
- − Fleet renewal delays
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Garuda Indonesia. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while Garuda Indonesia offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.