ANA (All Nippon Airways) vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| ANA (All Nippon Airways) | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | The Room Lie-flat Suite | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 24 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | Oneworld |
| IATA | NH | MH |
| Hubs | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Narita International Airport (NRT) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
ANA (All Nippon Airways) — Pros & Cons
- + The Room suite offers a door and exceptional privacy
- + Outstanding Japanese-inspired cuisine
- + Impeccable service standards
- − Limited to transpacific and select European routes
- − The Room only on 777-300ER; 787 product is older
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
ANA (All Nippon Airways) takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Malaysia Airlines. ANA (All Nippon Airways) stands out with its The Room Lie-flat Suite, while Malaysia Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.