Asiana Airlines vs United Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Asiana Airlines | United Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout | Polaris lie-flat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | Star Alliance |
| IATA | OZ | UA |
| Hubs | Seoul Incheon (ICN) | Newark (EWR), San Francisco (SFO), Chicago O'Hare (ORD), Houston (IAH) |
Asiana Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Elegant Korean service with attention to detail
- + Modern A350 suite product
- + Excellent Korean cuisine onboard
- − Fleet integration with Korean Air ongoing
- − A380 being phased out
- − Smaller network than Korean Air
United Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Polaris seats with excellent bedding
- + Dedicated Polaris lounges at hubs
- + Massive global route network
- − Inconsistent product across fleet
- − Older 767s lack direct aisle access
The verdict
Asiana Airlines takes the edge with a 8/10 rating compared to 7/10 for United Airlines. Asiana Airlines stands out with its Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout, while United Airlines offers Polaris lie-flat. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.