China Airlines vs JAL Business Class Comparison
| China Airlines | JAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 | Sky Suite III |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 23 inches |
| Alliance | SkyTeam | Oneworld |
| IATA | CI | JL |
| Hubs | Taipei Taoyuan (TPE) | Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND), Tokyo Narita Airport (NRT) |
China Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Refined Taiwanese service and cuisine
- + Good value premium fares from Asia
- − Older 777 and A330 products less competitive
- − Brand sometimes confused with mainland Chinese carriers
- − Limited long-haul network
JAL — Pros & Cons
- + Sky Suite with doors
- + Exceptional Japanese service
- + Premium Sakura lounges
- − Premium pricing
- − Limited North American routes
- − Older 787 without doors
The verdict
JAL takes the edge with a 9/10 rating compared to 7/10 for China Airlines. JAL stands out with its Sky Suite III, while China Airlines offers Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.