China Airlines vs Turkish Airlines Business Class Comparison
| China Airlines | Turkish Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 | Lie-flat Business Class Seat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 20 inches |
| Alliance | SkyTeam | Star Alliance |
| IATA | CI | TK |
| Hubs | Taipei Taoyuan (TPE) | Istanbul Airport (IST) |
China Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Refined Taiwanese service and cuisine
- + Good value premium fares from Asia
- − Older 777 and A330 products less competitive
- − Brand sometimes confused with mainland Chinese carriers
- − Limited long-haul network
Turkish Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Istanbul lounge is one of the world's best business class lounges
- + Massive global network with 340+ destinations
- + Strong Turkish-inspired catering with a flying chef
- − Seat hardware lacks doors or enclosed suites
- − Older 777 configurations use 2-3-2 layout on some routes
The verdict
Turkish Airlines takes the edge with a 8/10 rating compared to 7/10 for China Airlines. Turkish Airlines stands out with its Lie-flat Business Class Seat, while China Airlines offers Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.