China Airlines vs United Airlines Business Class Comparison
| China Airlines | United Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 | Polaris lie-flat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | SkyTeam | Star Alliance |
| IATA | CI | UA |
| Hubs | Taipei Taoyuan (TPE) | Newark (EWR), San Francisco (SFO), Chicago O'Hare (ORD), Houston (IAH) |
China Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Refined Taiwanese service and cuisine
- + Good value premium fares from Asia
- − Older 777 and A330 products less competitive
- − Brand sometimes confused with mainland Chinese carriers
- − Limited long-haul network
United Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Polaris seats with excellent bedding
- + Dedicated Polaris lounges at hubs
- + Massive global route network
- − Inconsistent product across fleet
- − Older 767s lack direct aisle access
The verdict
Both China Airlines and United Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. China Airlines offers Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 while United Airlines features Polaris lie-flat. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.