Condor vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Condor | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Prime Seat Lie-flat on A330neo | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | None | Oneworld |
| IATA | DE | MH |
| Hubs | Frankfurt (FRA) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Condor — Pros & Cons
- + Brand new A330neo fleet with modern lie-flat product
- + Attractive leisure routes at good prices
- + Fresh branding and cabin design
- − Limited network focused on leisure destinations
- − No alliance for earning miles
- − Lounge access relies on third-party providers
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Both Condor and Malaysia Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. Condor offers Prime Seat Lie-flat on A330neo while Malaysia Airlines features Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.