Finnair vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Finnair | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | AirLounge | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | Oneworld | Oneworld |
| IATA | AY | MH |
| Hubs | Helsinki Vantaa (HEL) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Finnair — Pros & Cons
- + AirLounge concept with bench-style seats
- + Fastest Europe-Asia routing via Helsinki
- + Nordic design aesthetic
- − AirLounge controversial — no traditional lie-flat on some A350s
- − Small network beyond Nordics
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Both Finnair and Malaysia Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. Finnair offers AirLounge while Malaysia Airlines features Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.