Hawaiian Airlines vs Royal Brunei Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Hawaiian Airlines | Royal Brunei Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat in 2-2-2 Layout on A330 | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on 787 |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 19 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Oneworld | None |
| IATA | HA | BI |
| Hubs | Honolulu Daniel K. Inouye (HNL) | Bandar Seri Begawan (BWN) |
Hawaiian Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Hawaiian hospitality and island-inspired service
- + Lie-flat seats to Hawaii on A330
- + Incoming 787-9 fleet with new premium product
- − 2-2-2 layout lacks direct aisle access
- − Limited route network beyond Hawaii
- − Seat width narrower than competitors
Royal Brunei Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Modern 787 product with spacious lie-flat seats
- + Calm and attentive service
- + Dry airline but generous soft product
- − No alcohol served (dry airline)
- − Very small route network
- − Limited lounge options at outstations
The verdict
Both Hawaiian Airlines and Royal Brunei Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. Hawaiian Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 2-2-2 Layout on A330 while Royal Brunei Airlines features Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on 787. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.