KLM Royal Dutch Airlines vs Royal Brunei Airlines Business Class Comparison
| KLM Royal Dutch Airlines | Royal Brunei Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on 787 |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 20 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | SkyTeam | None |
| IATA | KL | BI |
| Hubs | Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) | Bandar Seri Begawan (BWN) |
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Strong Amsterdam hub with short connections
- + Full lie-flat on all long-haul
- + Dutch-designed amenity kits
- − Narrow 2-2-2 layout on 777s lacks privacy
- − No direct aisle access for all seats
Royal Brunei Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Modern 787 product with spacious lie-flat seats
- + Calm and attentive service
- + Dry airline but generous soft product
- − No alcohol served (dry airline)
- − Very small route network
- − Limited lounge options at outstations
The verdict
Both KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and Royal Brunei Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines offers Lie-flat while Royal Brunei Airlines features Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on 787. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.