Malaysia Airlines vs Turkish Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Malaysia Airlines | Turkish Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout | Lie-flat Business Class Seat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 20 inches |
| Alliance | Oneworld | Star Alliance |
| IATA | MH | TK |
| Hubs | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) | Istanbul Airport (IST) |
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
Turkish Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Istanbul lounge is one of the world's best business class lounges
- + Massive global network with 340+ destinations
- + Strong Turkish-inspired catering with a flying chef
- − Seat hardware lacks doors or enclosed suites
- − Older 777 configurations use 2-3-2 layout on some routes
The verdict
Turkish Airlines takes the edge with a 8/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Malaysia Airlines. Turkish Airlines stands out with its Lie-flat Business Class Seat, while Malaysia Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.