Malaysia Airlines vs United Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Malaysia Airlines | United Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout | Polaris lie-flat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 22 inches |
| Alliance | Oneworld | Star Alliance |
| IATA | MH | UA |
| Hubs | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) | Newark (EWR), San Francisco (SFO), Chicago O'Hare (ORD), Houston (IAH) |
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
United Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Polaris seats with excellent bedding
- + Dedicated Polaris lounges at hubs
- + Massive global route network
- − Inconsistent product across fleet
- − Older 767s lack direct aisle access
The verdict
Both Malaysia Airlines and United Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. Malaysia Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout while United Airlines features Polaris lie-flat. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.