Air Astana vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Air Astana | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat on 767, Recliner on A321LR | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | None | Oneworld |
| IATA | KC | MH |
| Hubs | Almaty (ALA), Astana (TSE) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Air Astana — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent service for a Central Asian carrier
- + Lie-flat on 767 long-haul
- + Modern fleet with A321LR for medium-haul
- − 767 is an aging platform
- − Small route network
- − A321LR business class is recliner only
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Both Air Astana and Malaysia Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. Air Astana offers Lie-flat Seat on 767, Recliner on A321LR while Malaysia Airlines features Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.