Air Canada vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Air Canada | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Reverse Herringbone Suite with Sliding Door | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | Oneworld |
| IATA | AC | MH |
| Hubs | Toronto Pearson (YYZ), Montreal-Trudeau (YUL), Vancouver (YVR) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Air Canada — Pros & Cons
- + 1-2-1 layout with direct aisle access on all long-haul aircraft
- + Door suites on 787 Dreamliner
- + Strong Star Alliance partner network
- − Older 777 product still on some routes
- − Lounge network outside Canada is limited
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Air Canada takes the edge with a 8/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Malaysia Airlines. Air Canada stands out with its Reverse Herringbone Suite with Sliding Door, while Malaysia Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.