Asiana Airlines vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Asiana Airlines | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | Star Alliance | Oneworld |
| IATA | OZ | MH |
| Hubs | Seoul Incheon (ICN) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Asiana Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Elegant Korean service with attention to detail
- + Modern A350 suite product
- + Excellent Korean cuisine onboard
- − Fleet integration with Korean Air ongoing
- − A380 being phased out
- − Smaller network than Korean Air
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Asiana Airlines takes the edge with a 8/10 rating compared to 7/10 for Malaysia Airlines. Asiana Airlines stands out with its Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout, while Malaysia Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Both airlines provide lie-flat business class seats, so the best choice depends on your route, schedule, and personal preferences.