Azul Brazilian Airlines vs Malaysia Airlines Business Class Comparison
| Azul Brazilian Airlines | Malaysia Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on A330 | Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 21 inches | 21 inches |
| Alliance | None | Oneworld |
| IATA | AD | MH |
| Hubs | Campinas Viracopos (VCP), São Paulo Guarulhos (GRU) | Kuala Lumpur International (KUL) |
Azul Brazilian Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Modern A330neo with lie-flat product
- + Brazilian warmth in service
- + Competitive fares from Brazil
- − Limited international network
- − No alliance for global mileage earning
- − Campinas hub less convenient than GRU
Malaysia Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Malaysian hospitality (MH stands for Malaysian Hospitality)
- + Competitive fares from Kuala Lumpur
- − Older A330 product on some routes
- − Network has shrunk from peak size
- − Lounge access varies at outstations
The verdict
Both Azul Brazilian Airlines and Malaysia Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. Azul Brazilian Airlines offers Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout on A330 while Malaysia Airlines features Lie-flat Seat in 1-2-1 Layout. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.