China Airlines vs KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Business Class Comparison
| China Airlines | KLM Royal Dutch Airlines | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Seat type | Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 | Lie-flat |
| Lie-flat | Yes | Yes |
| Seat width | 22 inches | 20 inches |
| Alliance | SkyTeam | SkyTeam |
| IATA | CI | KL |
| Hubs | Taipei Taoyuan (TPE) | Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) |
China Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Excellent A350 business class product
- + Refined Taiwanese service and cuisine
- + Good value premium fares from Asia
- − Older 777 and A330 products less competitive
- − Brand sometimes confused with mainland Chinese carriers
- − Limited long-haul network
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines — Pros & Cons
- + Strong Amsterdam hub with short connections
- + Full lie-flat on all long-haul
- + Dutch-designed amenity kits
- − Narrow 2-2-2 layout on 777s lacks privacy
- − No direct aisle access for all seats
The verdict
Both China Airlines and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines earn a 7/10 rating, making this a close call. China Airlines offers Lie-flat Suite in 1-2-1 Layout on A350 while KLM Royal Dutch Airlines features Lie-flat. Your decision should come down to route availability, alliance loyalty, and which seat product appeals more to you.